We are excited to announce the launch of our new forums! You can access it forums.aavso.org. For questions, please see our blog post. The forums at aavso.org/forum have become read-only.
Announcement: New Applications
We are excited to announce the launch of our new applications! We're opening up early access to our new applications for searching, downloading, and submitting photometric observations. You can now access these applications through these links:
We ask for your feedback in order to help us improve these applications. Please send feedback for the applications above to feedback@aavso.org. Note: please avoid duplicating submissions across the two submit applications.
Yes, of course, and that's why I've been surprised by 30-min map of CT Lac with bright star 6.3m, which was V365. It's not a problem, maybe I'm just not experienced obsever.
Normally, variable stars are not used as comparison stars. Could you please describe the circumstances under which V365 Lac was used?
Yes, of course, and that's why I've been surprised by 30-min map of CT Lac with bright star 6.3m, which was V365. It's not a problem, maybe I'm just not experienced obsever.
Agreed, I suspect that this is a mistake since V365 Lac should not be included in a list of potential comparison stars.