Degen1103 Affiliation American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) Thu, 11/10/2022 - 16:26 Explain please, why bright ELL binary V365 Lac is used as comparison star? kevinbalton Affiliation American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) Fri, 11/11/2022 - 23:38 V365 Lac Normally, variable stars are not used as comparison stars. Could you please describe the circumstances under which V365 Lac was used? Log in or register to post comments Degen1103 Affiliation American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) Sat, 11/12/2022 - 14:56 Yes, of course, and that's… Yes, of course, and that's why I've been surprised by 30-min map of CT Lac with bright star 6.3m, which was V365. It's not a problem, maybe I'm just not experienced obsever. Log in or register to post comments kevinbalton Affiliation American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) Sat, 11/12/2022 - 15:52 Yes, of course, and that's… Agreed, I suspect that this is a mistake since V365 Lac should not be included in a list of potential comparison stars. Log in or register to post comments
kevinbalton Affiliation American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) Fri, 11/11/2022 - 23:38 V365 Lac Normally, variable stars are not used as comparison stars. Could you please describe the circumstances under which V365 Lac was used? Log in or register to post comments
Degen1103 Affiliation American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) Sat, 11/12/2022 - 14:56 Yes, of course, and that's… Yes, of course, and that's why I've been surprised by 30-min map of CT Lac with bright star 6.3m, which was V365. It's not a problem, maybe I'm just not experienced obsever. Log in or register to post comments
kevinbalton Affiliation American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) Sat, 11/12/2022 - 15:52 Yes, of course, and that's… Agreed, I suspect that this is a mistake since V365 Lac should not be included in a list of potential comparison stars. Log in or register to post comments
Normally, variable stars are not used as comparison stars. Could you please describe the circumstances under which V365 Lac was used?
Yes, of course, and that's why I've been surprised by 30-min map of CT Lac with bright star 6.3m, which was V365. It's not a problem, maybe I'm just not experienced obsever.
Agreed, I suspect that this is a mistake since V365 Lac should not be included in a list of potential comparison stars.