We are excited to announce the launch of our new forums! You can access it forums.aavso.org. For questions, please see our blog post. The forums at aavso.org/forum have become read-only.
Announcement: New Applications
We are excited to announce the launch of our new applications! We're opening up early access to our new applications for searching, downloading, and submitting photometric observations. You can now access these applications through these links:
We ask for your feedback in order to help us improve these applications. Please send feedback for the applications above to feedback@aavso.org. Note: please avoid duplicating submissions across the two submit applications.
Your single CCD estimate looks rather isolated on the LCG. Did you check visually? I took the last 60 days; no other contribution from yourself ! How sure are you about this, on a basis of 1 to 10?
I don't get much attention on Forum either. See “SAO 58521 Revisited”... We're fellow sufferers.
Your single CCD estimate looks rather isolated on the LCG. Did you check visually? I took the last 60 days; no other contribution from yourself ! How sure are you about this, on a basis of 1 to 10?
[/quote]
Don't blame me if my observation is isolated - talk to everyone who hasn't posted one lately.
Yes, I did check my image. It was consistent with my previous images when R CrB was about the same brightness. Sorry I couldn't get to it for the past 60 days. The link I provided was for 200 days and clearly shows that I monitor it when I can (my obs are highlighted). On a scale 1 to 10 - 9.8.
I just wrote a review of many of the RCBs over the last year for the January newsletter, and noticed your observation, indicating that RCB has indeed faded once again, just when I thought it might recover! Now I'm begining to wonder if RCB will ever go back to being a 6th magnitude star. It hasn't been brighter than 10th magnitude since the beginning of 2007.
For me, and I'd guess a lot of observers, it is exactly the unpredictable nature of these rare stars that makes them so fun to watch in the first place.
R CrB in this millenium. Remember when this was a binocular object most of the time?
Hi James,
Your single CCD estimate looks rather isolated on the LCG. Did you check visually? I took the last 60 days; no other contribution from yourself ! How sure are you about this, on a basis of 1 to 10?
I don't get much attention on Forum either. See “SAO 58521 Revisited”... We're fellow sufferers.
[quote=WWJ]
Your single CCD estimate looks rather isolated on the LCG. Did you check visually? I took the last 60 days; no other contribution from yourself ! How sure are you about this, on a basis of 1 to 10?
[/quote]
Don't blame me if my observation is isolated - talk to everyone who hasn't posted one lately.
Yes, I did check my image. It was consistent with my previous images when R CrB was about the same brightness. Sorry I couldn't get to it for the past 60 days. The link I provided was for 200 days and clearly shows that I monitor it when I can (my obs are highlighted). On a scale 1 to 10 - 9.8.
Good Jim,
That seems to have unblocked the pipe! Must try it more often!
Bill.
Hi Jim,
I just wrote a review of many of the RCBs over the last year for the January newsletter, and noticed your observation, indicating that RCB has indeed faded once again, just when I thought it might recover! Now I'm begining to wonder if RCB will ever go back to being a 6th magnitude star. It hasn't been brighter than 10th magnitude since the beginning of 2007.
For me, and I'd guess a lot of observers, it is exactly the unpredictable nature of these rare stars that makes them so fun to watch in the first place.
R CrB in this millenium. Remember when this was a binocular object most of the time?
Yes, fading indeed. Observed on Friday 12/13 visually at <13.4 Larry- (slh)
Yep, I make it a little fainter still at 14.8 .
Doug.