NU ORI: the brightness estimates are weaker than the minimum brightness of the variable ???
Announcement: New Forums
We are excited to announce the launch of our new forums! You can access it forums.aavso.org. For questions, please see our blog post. The forums at aavso.org/forum have become read-only.
Announcement: New Applications
We are excited to announce the launch of our new applications! We're opening up early access to our new applications for searching, downloading, and submitting photometric observations. You can now access these applications through these links:
We ask for your feedback in order to help us improve these applications. Please send feedback for the applications above to feedback@aavso.org. Note: please avoid duplicating submissions across the two submit applications.
I don't know exactly what you mean but this object is difficult to measure due to the surrounding nebula.
E.g. different surveys have different resolution power and the amount of nebula contribution will be different. And the emission lines in nebulae cause different response if the same filters are not used.
E.g. one can get get V= 6.74 or so after transforming from Hp magnitudes.
Tycho gives V= 6.87 (from Bt and Vt)
ASAS-3 gets V= 6.66 or so.
GCPD (standard V data) gives V= 6.83 or so.
ASAS should be standard too but their photometric aperture is larger so more nebula light is included.
These differences do not necessarily mean variability, actually each of these sources separately only show scatter below 0.05 mag.
What you see in the light curve it's likely just observational error. Visual sensitivity to the nebula light, magnification used to observe, etc.
Hi Daniel,
I don't know exactly what you mean but this object is difficult to measure due to the surrounding nebula.
E.g. different surveys have different resolution power and the amount of nebula contribution will be different. And the emission lines in nebulae cause different response if the same filters are not used.
E.g. one can get get V= 6.74 or so after transforming from Hp magnitudes.
Tycho gives V= 6.87 (from Bt and Vt)
ASAS-3 gets V= 6.66 or so.
GCPD (standard V data) gives V= 6.83 or so.
ASAS should be standard too but their photometric aperture is larger so more nebula light is included.
These differences do not necessarily mean variability, actually each of these sources separately only show scatter below 0.05 mag.
What you see in the light curve it's likely just observational error. Visual sensitivity to the nebula light, magnification used to observe, etc.
Best wishes,
Sebastian