AAVSO Alert Notice 784 gives preliminary announcement of an observing campaign on the recurrent nova T Pyx in support of HST observations to be carried out in 2022-2023. Please see the notice for details and observing instructions.
There are threads for this campaign under the following forums:
- Campaigns and Observing Reports: https://www.aavso.org/t-pyx-hst-2022-2023
- Cataclysmic Variables: https://www.aavso.org/t-pyx-hst-2022-2023-01
Please subscribe to these threads if you are participating in the campaign so you can be updated. Join in the discussion or ask questions there!
Many thanks, and Good observing,
Elizabeth O. Waagen, AAVSO HQ
Thank you Elizabeth for putting a preliminary Alert Notice about T Pyxidis!
And thanks to all the AAVSO observers who have been observing cataclysmic variables for countless (and sleepless) nights providing extremely valuable data for many decades! I have been working on cataclysmic variables for more than 3 decades now, and I have often used the AAVSO data (light curve generator) to check many of the cataclysmic variables I have worked on (especially in the last 20 years; before that I was working on Theory rather than Observations).
T Pyxidis is a recurrent nova, and as such it has erupted six times since 1890 (it erupted in 1890, 1902, 1920, 1944, 1967, and 2011). The binary is made of a white dwarf which accretes matter from its companion star. While white dwarfs are made mostly of carbon and oxygen, the matter from the other star is made mostly of hydrogen. The hydrogen-rich material forms an accretion disk around the white dwarf and this material moves inwards onto the white dwarf. The hydrogen accumulates into a layer onto the white dwarf surface and due to the high gravity of the white dwarf that layer is being compressed, its temperature and density increase as more material is transferred from the companion star onto the white dwarf. When the pressure and temperature is high enough at the base of the hydrogen layer (after usually thousands of years), it undergoes fusion (into helium) and the thermonuclear reaction propagates all over the surface of the white dwarf (thermonuclear runaway) to consume all the hydrogen. That explosion is the nova which ejects material (forming a shell, or at least some clumps). T Pyxidis underwent six such nova explosions since 1890: the recurrence time for the explosions of T Pyx is 20 to 40 years (rather than 1000s of years), which makes T Pyx a fast recurrent novae. T Pyx last eruption was in 2011 and it is not expected to go into another outburst for another 30 years or more. T Pyx now has come back to a "quiescent" state, where it has completely cooled down from its eruption and the ejected material is not interacting as strongly as in the early phase following the explosion.
It is therefore a good time to observe T Pyx with HST, to obtain an ultraviolet and an optical spectra of the white dwarf with its accretion disk. The accretion disk is the dominant source in the UV and optical, and the spectra can tell us how much matter is being accreted onto the white dwarf. Since the white dwarf is also losing mass during its eruptions, one can find out whether the mass of the white dwarf is increasing with time and whether it can reach the Chandrasekhar limit for a supernova explosion. For this reason T Pyx will be observed with HST in the coming HST Cycle 30, starting anywhere between October 1st 2022 and September 30th 2023.
The "windows of opportunity" for the HST observations have not yet been fixed and it might take weeks to months before I am informed.
While it seems that the recurrence time of T Pyx nova explosions is increasing (from 12 years in 1902 to 44 years in 2011), and that T Pyx might not erupt for another 30 years or so, we cannot rule out an unexpected behavior from the system.
However, if T Pyxidis goes into another one of its (recurrent) nova eruptions just as HST is looking at it, this will basically "fry" the detector and likely damage the hardware of the HST instruments/detectors ("STIS" for optical spectroscopy and "COS" for the UV spectroscopy). So in order to ensure that T Pyx is not erupting during that time, T Pyx needs to be monitored in the weeks and days before the HST observations. For HST safe target offset procedure to work properly, continuous photometric monitoring is required for at least 7 consecutive days leading to the HST observations (and within the 24 hrs of the target being observed by HST). The HST observations will likely be split into two, such that there will be two HST observations separated by (likely) days-to-a-month (one observation for the STIS optical, and one for the COS ultraviolet). Each HST observations will need photometric monitoring.
I am making a similar post on the same thread in the other forum.
Again thanks!
Patrick
Hi
Is there value in continuing to observe T Pyx for this campaign or has it ended?
Regards
Andrew (PEX)
Hi Andrew,
Elizabeth had initially opened the discussion on T Pyx both in Cataclysmic Variables and in Campaigns and Observations, and the discussion went on in Campaigns and Observations.
I posted there the preliminary schedule of observation for T Pyx with more details. Here it is:
https://www.aavso.org/t-pyx-hst-2022-2023
The bottom line is that it has to be monitored somewhere starting around mid-Feb and cover the period of the two HST observations to take place somewhere beginning of March through April. So, in a way it hasn't started.
Thanks for bringing this up.
Patrick
The planned first HST observation of T Pyx has been moved from the first week of March to March 24-25 (2023).
The second HST observations has also been changed and will be either in the week following the first observation (March 24- April 4) or later in April (April 12 - April 27).
These represent "windows" and the exact dates/time might only come a week before the actual observation.
Ideally ground monitoring should start about two weeks prior to the HST observations (say March 10) and continue through the HST observations.
I know some of you have already started monitoring T Pyx, Thanks a lot!
Clear and Dark Skies!
The same message has been posted on both the
Campaigns and Observing Reports: https://www.aavso.org/t-pyx-hst-2022-2023
and
Cataclysmic Variables: https://www.aavso.org/t-pyx-hst-2022-2023-01
Thank you all,
Patrick
I posted a delay on the HST observations of T Pyx, but no email notification was sent,
so I am posting this to draw the attention of the AAVSO observers who already started observing,
hoping that this time an email notification will be sent.
The first HST observation of T Pyx will be (as of now) on March 24 or 25, 2023.
Ground optical monitoring is needed starting about two weeks before that and through the HST observation.
Thanks.
AAVSO Alert Notice 815 gives the revised schedule of this month's HST observations of the recurrent nova T Pyx. Please see the notice for details and observing instructions.
There are threads for this campaign under the following AAVSO forums:
- Campaigns and Observing Reports: https://www.aavso.org/t-pyx-hst-2022-2023
- Cataclysmic Variables: https://www.aavso.org/t-pyx-hst-2022-2023-01
Please subscribe to these threads if you are participating in the campaign so you can be updated. Join in the discussion or ask questions there!
Many thanks, and Good observing,
Elizabeth O. Waagen, AAVSO HQ
Thank you all, thank you Elizabeth, for providing and organizing continuous monitoring of T Pyx, which is now being transmitted to STScI (Space Telescope Science Institute - HST scientists) on a daily basis.
I wanted to let you know that the last minute HST planned schedule of T Pyx observations is that the first HST observation/visit
will start on March 24 2023 very near 00:00:00 UTC time,
the second visit will follow within about 8hr of the first visit.
Every single data point of the continuous AAVSO monitoring you provide is very important up to within 24hr of the HST observations.
Again, thanks!
Clear skies and Dark Nights!
Patrick
The AAVSO sequence for T Pyx has been extended from 15.8 to 18.3. T Pyx has gradually been becoming fainter in recent years and is now around 16.1 V, so the sequence no longer went deep enough. Also, the range has been revised in VSX to 6.2 - 16.1 V. Thanks go to Steve O'Meara for bringing this to our attention, Mike Poxon and Chuck Cynamon of the AAVSO Sequence Team for the extension, and Sebastián Otero for re-determining T Pyx's range and making the VSX revision.
Good observing,
Elizabeth
Thank you all for providing monitoring support for the HST observations of T Pyxidis.
The HST observations have successfully been completed earlier today and I really appreciate the help you all provided.
Patrick