We are excited to announce the launch of our new forums! You can access it forums.aavso.org. For questions, please see our blog post. The forums at aavso.org/forum have become read-only.
Announcement: New Applications
We are excited to announce the launch of our new applications! We're opening up early access to our new applications for searching, downloading, and submitting photometric observations. You can now access these applications through these links:
We ask for your feedback in order to help us improve these applications. Please send feedback for the applications above to feedback@aavso.org. Note: please avoid duplicating submissions across the two submit applications.
Indeed, 0803+62 SU UMa in undergoing a supermaximum, as indicated in my report posted on the Yahoo Group CVNET-OUTBURST page last evening. There I reported SU as at magnitude 11.5 , in addition to my having also noted it the previous evening at 12.2 .
As BBI points out, observations of the star are currently very meger with SU being best observed just before dawn just coming out of its period of poorly coverage during its conjunction gap. In fact, this star really should be at least marginally covered all during its solar conjunction interval because of its northerly declination, but it apparently is not.
Indeed, 0803+62 SU UMa in undergoing a supermaximum, as indicated in my report posted on the Yahoo Group CVNET-OUTBURST page last evening. There I reported SU as at magnitude 11.5 , in addition to my having also noted it the previous evening at 12.2 .
As BBI points out, observations of the star are currently very meger with SU being best observed just before dawn just coming out of its period of poorly coverage during its conjunction gap. In fact, this star really should be at least marginally covered all during its solar conjunction interval because of its northerly declination, but it apparently is not.
J.Bortle (BRJ)