We are excited to announce the launch of our new forums! You can access it forums.aavso.org. For questions, please see our blog post. The forums at aavso.org/forum have become read-only.
Announcement: New Applications
We are excited to announce the launch of our new applications! We're opening up early access to our new applications for searching, downloading, and submitting photometric observations. You can now access these applications through these links:
We ask for your feedback in order to help us improve these applications. Please send feedback for the applications above to feedback@aavso.org. Note: please avoid duplicating submissions across the two submit applications.
I have (unreported) V obs from back on March 3.78 and March 30.69 UT which show HK Sco was at 13.70V on Mar 3 and 13.55V on Mar 30. These were obtained good conditions and the same three comps were used both times (127, 132_1, and 140_1). So your 13.2vis from last night surely points to it being even brighter now.
I will try some multi color obs next chance I have and compare it to last years colors (also unreported) and those available in the literature to check for changes.
Thanks for bringing this star into discussion and good luck with future observations.
HK Sco is brighter, according to my observations. If interested look at 4000 days highlight PAW. More observers would be helpful. I could be wrong.
Hi Alan
I have (unreported) V obs from back on March 3.78 and March 30.69 UT which show HK Sco was at 13.70V on Mar 3 and 13.55V on Mar 30. These were obtained good conditions and the same three comps were used both times (127, 132_1, and 140_1). So your 13.2vis from last night surely points to it being even brighter now.
I will try some multi color obs next chance I have and compare it to last years colors (also unreported) and those available in the literature to check for changes.
Thanks for bringing this star into discussion and good luck with future observations.
Steve